Tuesday, June 3, 2008

My Love Affair With The Nokia 5310 XPressMusic Abruptly Ends



While grooving to a tune on my Nokia 5310 XpressMusic T-Mobile phone in the McDonald's drive thru this morning, the oddest thing happened: the phone rebooted itself.

Strange, maybe it was just a glitch. So I resumed listening to my music, and then on another song the phone rebooted again. No warning, just a quick reboot.

So a quick little Google search for "Nokia 5310 reboot" uncovered this little gem, with this problem happening to customers over 5 months ago. I just bought this phone on Friday and they still haven't fixed this problem? See you later, XPressMusic. If you're a "music phone", and you reboot at random when trying to play music, that's just sad. Really sad.

I'm going to take the phone back tomorrow and exchange it for the Nokia 6263. Seems to be a decent phone to get me by until my T-Mobile contract is up.

Then again, I'm 0-1 when I praise a Nokia phone thus far.

Photo credit: ME

Labels: , , ,


Sunday, June 1, 2008

T-Mobile and the Nokia 5310 XpressMusic



Anyone who's been following my Twitter posts knows exactly how sick I was over the T-Mobile Dash. The way it leaked memory like a sieve causing you to reboot the phone several times a day, the poor audio quality on the videos, the rapidly deteriorating battery life, and inability to play streaming video were just a few of the reasons I hated it so. (I'm not the only one who had problems.) Well, what ended up killing it was the fact that it would randomly shut off during any type of over-the-air data transfer or any phone call that took longer than 2 minutes. (The phone would just go black, not actually go through a power down T-Mobile logo love fest cycle.)

The best part of all? I got swindled into signing a 2-year contract extension to upgrade so I could get $100 knocked off the price plus a $50 rebate that T-Mobile never honored for me. All of the functional problems I discovered weren't until several months later and at that point T-Mobile had no obligation to assist me with that T-Mobile Dash. How can a company look its customers in the eye and feel good about signing them into a contract so they can get a deep discount on a piece of technology that won't survive up 25-50% of the contract period?

So after one cut off conversation too many last Thursday, it was time to go look for another phone, as I'm locked into a T-Mobile contract for the next several months and have no desire to reward the pirates at that company with a severance check for customer no-service.

My premise was simple: I needed a phone that could run the Google Java applications so I could check my Gmail account and look at maps while out and about. I also wanted Bluetooth compatibility, a camera that could shoot video as well as stills, and I did not want a Windows Mobile device as that operating system is about as reliable as a dollar store diaper.

So in all my searching and comparing reviews on CNet, I came up with the Nokia 5310 XpressMusic as my phone of choice, weighing in with a $200 price tag, and set off to the T-Mobile store the very next day to buy it.

Apparently this is a pretty new phone, and I knew more about this particular model than the sales representative who helped me. The first thing I did when I took it out of the box was try out some music. Worked very well, and the music came out of the speaker very crisp and clear.

The next thing I played with was the camera phone. Also very easy and the quality of the audio was a night-and-day improvement over the T-Mobile Dash. The video looked how all cell phone video quality looks to me - grainy and dithered, but you could at least see what's going on.

Now it was time to put the phone through the real paces. I sent a picture message to a friend. Worked very well. Sent and received some text messages. I liked the intuitive "guess what you're trying to type" text entering method, as it saved me from having to push the 7 button four times just to get an "S".

Now I was ready to install my Gmail and Google Maps applications. I went to m.google.com and clicked on the download link for Gmail. Google detected my phone and the link downloaded the newest version of the Gmail Java application. So far so good!

After the application downloaded, I gave it a whirl. I was suddenly presented with an error message: "Application access set to not allowed." Seemed like it would be easy to fix; all I'd have to do is just go into the options and change a setting for this application.

I clicked on Options, then scrolled down the menu and saw where it said "Application access." Now we're really cooking! Er, but wait... it's grayed out. No matter, T-Mobile certainly wouldn't be criminal enough to cripple a feature on a device I paid them full price for. Furthermore, I know T-Mobile in their wise and sound judgment would surely allow me as a customer currently subscribed to the "Total Internet Access" package to grant 3rd party applications access to the data network. But alas, this was not so.

I can't stomach anymore sarcasm. Truth is, I knew damn well what was going on as soon as I saw the option was grayed out and I got pissed. Really pissed. Shouldn't those thieves and villains at T-Horrible be forced to disclose when they've disabled a feature on the phone in a manner that is easily visible? If you're buying a product that has set capabilities, as a customer I would expect those capabilities to be there when I open the box and use the product.

The story gets better. For kicks I clicked on "Application access" anyways just to see what would happen, and I received the "Not available for this application" error. Now it was time to call T-Mobile's Technically Challenged Support department.

After saying a couple of prayers and having sadtrombone.com loaded and ready for comical relief, I dialed up T-Mobile and was connected to a representative after a short few minute wait. I explained very clearly what the problem was and that I needed to know how to unlock the "Application access" feature for Java applications. The T-Mobile representative's solution? The phone will magically unlock itself after 48 hours and I will be able to use all the Java applications my little heart desires.

And when I expressed disbelief, the representative offered me clear and convincing proof: my t-mobile.com profile still displayed that I was using a T-Mobile Dash. Wow. It wasn't because I hadn't logged in and updated which phone I owned, it was because the magical towers of T-Mobile haven't detected my new phone.

After it was clear to me I was talking to a brick wall, I decided to go another route: online chat support. I had the pleasure of typing to Sanja, who was very polite in his cut and paste conversation. After diligently typing out the problem and my request, I was told flatly: T-Mobile does not support any 3rd party applications on their phones. What an odd response, as they probably make a fortune selling 3rd party applications on T-Zones. And if I didn't like the answer? Take the phone back within 14 days I was told.

The problem with taking this phone back is the rest of the device lineup is so pathetic, I don't think there's a viable choice I would want to exchange for. I don't have much longer to go on my T-Mobile contract, so I think I will just cancel my Total Internet Service package and tough out the last few months of T-Horrible, then move to a company that makes me feel like a valued customer and not a moronic sheep.

If there's a phone that works really well in unlocked mode or if you're in love with your mobile carrier, I'd love to hear any suggestions you might have.

And if you want to know anything else about the Nokia 5310 XpressMusic, I'd be more than happy to answer your questions in the comments. I will point out it has weak e-mail support (no IMAP, all messages are downloaded via SMS service) and the web browser does not present non-mobile sites well at all. Other than that, it's a decent phone. T-Mobile just crippled it, that's all.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Thursday, May 22, 2008

What can FidoNet teach us about today's fragmented conversation dilemma?



Remember the good old BBS days? When you could find good conversation on FidoNet?

We talk about the noise and the fragmenting of the conversation online, but if you ask me, what we had back in the day wasn't so bad.

FidoNet was much easier to the average person to follow than USENET, and SysOps could pick and choose which message board topics to offer to their subscriber base to better streamline the conversation. It was about connecting the users and the conversations. Someone in Dallas, Texas posts about the election of Bill Clinton, and I could add my thoughts on a separate bulletin board system in Michigan. Then someone in California would look at what we both had to say and share their opinion with the both of us.

In the days before the Internet was widely accepted, this was one hell of a way to connect to people around the globe that had access to the FidoNet. And it worked.

FriendFeed, Twitter, Pownce, Digg, Google Reader Notes, Blog Comments, etc... the conversation is fragmented terribly these days. Maybe it's time we take a page from some "old school" technology.

What if someone developed some type of standard "protocol" for the conversation to flow upon. Blog comments, Twitter posts, Pownce, FriendFeed, Digg, StumbleUpon, etc... if it all flowed on some type of standard protocol that synchronized within an agreed upon and coordinated network, you could pull the full conversation into your Blog or Website much like the SysOps pulled the conversation into their Bulletin Board Systems from FidoNet back in the early 1990s.

Then you'd have a system where someone who comments on a story on Digg could have his comment replied to by someone viewing the original blog post, and then several people could throw their two cents in on Twitter, and the entire thread could be followed on FriendFeed.

Easier said than done by a long shot, but if we start thinking FidoNet, maybe... just maybe... it'd be a step in the right direction.

Photo by Flickr user edans

Labels: , , , , , ,


Monday, May 12, 2008

Today's Open Question: "Does having a bluetooth earpiece make me a 'douchebag'?"



Earlier today I posted the above picture with TwitPic with this question on Twitter:

"Does having a bluetooth earpiece make me a 'douchebag'?"

What got me thinking about this was a picture Thomas Hawk posted on Flickr of a man who was angry about having his picture taken in public. When you hover your mouse over this guy's bluetooth earpiece, you'll see a user, Leela.a, tagged it as "This explains it all..."

Is there something generally understood about people who walk around with a bluetooth earpiece dangling off the side of their face?

Here are some of the responses I received on Twitter:

Speaking of those people who seem to hold an "imaginary conversation" whenever they're out in public with a bluetooth earpiece glued to their face, I think Larry David may have come up with the best solution for handling that situation:


Now I ask the rest of you... what do you think about bluetooth earpieces?

Labels: , ,


Friday, March 28, 2008

From Wired: Hackers Assault Epilepsy Patients via Computer


Photo courtesy of Flickr user gutter

Last weekend hackers used JavaScript and flashing animation graphics to trigger seizures and headaches among people who suffer from epilepsy on a popular epilepsy online support forum.

Click here for the article from Wired Magazine.

It just goes to show that evil knows no bounds.

When the individuals behind these attacks are caught, I wonder if they will be indicted for more than just computer crime related charges. Obviously these hackers intended to cause physical harm to the individuals viewing the images.

Wouldn't that constitute assault?

Labels: , , ,


Thursday, March 27, 2008

Modern Robotics at Work



My first impression: If this thing came at me in the woods looking like that, and sounding like that, I would definitely be scared as hell.

My next thought: Where to begin with all the great possibilities for this technology?

A few uses that I can think of right off the bat:
  • A pack mule that never gets tired and can be programmed to complete regular tasks unsupervised would be a God send for a small farm operator.
  • A device that can climb small terrain, compensate for sudden changes in friction, as well as quickly recover from a sudden shift in balance would open the doors to advanced exploration on other planets.
  • Camouflaged to look like a horse, people could ride around on one of these babies on their vacation property without the cost and effort of maintaining a living horse.
What do you think would be a possible application of this amazing technology?

(Thanks to @funkatron and @sevenzark for "tweeting" this video!)

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, November 6, 2007

Computers booting in just 4 seconds?

Photo of motherboard courtesy of Flickr user The Quux
Photo courtesy of Flickr user "The Quux"

DownloadSquad posted an article today about miniature operating systems that could have your system up and ready for watching movies or browsing the web in just 4 seconds.

This is done by having a stripped down operating system built right in to the motherboard.

Not only can you start using your computer that fast, your real operating system such as Windows Vista or XP would be loading up in the background.

I can't tell you how much of my life has been spent waiting for various computers running one version of Windows or another to boot up, and I'm sure the total time spent would sicken me. Cutting out that waste of time is a huge gain in my book, not to mention the energy savings for folks who would hardly ever turn off their systems due to this lengthy boot process.

For as much time humans have wasted on booting up over the decades this is one of those advancements that make you wonder why someone didn't think of it sooner, like automatic shower cleaners or pasta pots with a lid for draining out the water.

Once this technology is in place I certainly will be an early adopter.

Labels: , , , ,